Using Maximum Entropy in a Defeasible Logic with Probabilistic Semantics
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abs t rac t . In this paper we make defeasible inferences from conditional probabilities using the Principle of Total Evidence. This gives a logic that is a simple extension of the axiomatization of probabilistic logic as defined by Halpern's AX1. For our consequence relation, the reasoning is further justified by an assumption of the typicality of individuals mentioned in the data. For databases which do not determine a unique probability distribution, we select by default the distribution with Maximum Entropy. We situate this logic in the context of preferred models semantics.
منابع مشابه
Generation of Parametrically Uniform Knowledge Bases in a Relational Probabilistic Logic with Maximum Entropy Semantics
In a relational setting, the maximum entropy model of a set of probabilistic conditionals can be defined referring to the full set of ground instances of the conditionals. The logic FO-PCL uses the notion of parametric uniformity to ensure that the full grounding of the conditionals can be avoided, thereby greatly simplifying the maximum entropy model computation. In this paper, we describe a s...
متن کاملRelational Probabilistic Conditionals and Their Instantiations under Maximum Entropy Semantics for First-Order Knowledge Bases
For conditional probabilistic knowledge bases with conditionals based on propositional logic, the principle of maximum entropy (ME) is well-established, determining a unique model inductively completing the explicitly given knowledge. On the other hand, there is no general agreement on how to extend the ME principle to relational conditionals containing free variables. In this paper, we focus o...
متن کاملA Generalized Iterative Scaling Algorithm for Maximum Entropy Reasoning in Relational Probabilistic Conditional Logic Under Aggregation Semantics
Recently, different semantics for relational probabilistic conditionals and corresponding maximum entropy (ME) inference operators have been proposed. In this paper, we study the so-called aggregation semantics that covers both notions of a statistical and subjective view. The computation of its inference operator requires the calculation of the ME-distribution satisfying all probabilistic cond...
متن کاملA Semantic Decomposition of Defeasible Logics
We investigate defeasible logics using a technique which decomposes the semantics of such logics into two parts: a specification of the structure of defeasible reasoning and a semantics for the meta-language in which the specification is written. We show that Nute’s Defeasible Logic corresponds to Kunen’s semantics, and develop a defeasible logic from the well-founded semantics of Van Gelder, R...
متن کاملAmbiguity Propagating Defeasible Logic and the Well-Founded Semantics
The most recent version of defeasible logic (Nute, 1997) is related to the well-founded semantics by translating defeasible theories into normal logic programs using a simple scheme proposed in (Brewka, 2001). It is found that by introducing ambiguity propagation into this logic, the assertions of defeasible theories coincide with the well-founded models of their logic program translations. Wit...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1992